2013
DOI: 10.1159/000354781
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Subjective Experience of Thought Overactivation in Mood Disorders: Beyond Racing and Crowded Thoughts

Abstract: Background: Racing thoughts, crowded thoughts and flight of ideas are frequent symptoms in mood disorders, but the underlying subjective experience of overactivation of thought processes remains poorly documented. Methods: Qualitative analysis of audiotaped interviews explored subjective experience of thought overactivation in patients with mood disorders (sample 1, n = 45). Quantitative analysis considered the properties of a newly developed rating scale in sample 1, in an additional sample of patients with m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
20
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
3
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…CFA assists in the reduction of measurement error and allows the comparison of a priori models at the latent factor level (Jackson et al, 2009;Atkinson et al, 2011). In the present study, there were three a priori models regarding the construct validity of the RCTQ: (i) the single-factor model yielded by the STOQ-9 results (Keizer et al, 2014), (ii) the bifactorial model, referring to the racing vs. crowded thoughts theoretical distinction (Piguet et al, 2010), and (iii) the three-factor model, based on the results obtained in healthy individuals (Weiner et al, 2018). For the single-factor model, the 34 items of the RCTQ were included in the analysis (model 1); for the bifactorial model (model 2), 17 items belonging to the 'racing' a priori factor, i.e., items 2, 5, 7, 8, 11, 12, 14, 17, 20, 21, 22, 25, 28, 30, 31, 32 & 34, and 17 items belonging to the 'crowded' a priori factor, i.e., items 1, 3,4,6,9,10,13,15,16,18,19,23,24,26,27,29,33, were included; for the three-factor model (model 3), factor 1 consisted of items 1, 2, 4, 5, 7, 8 & 9, factor 2 consisted of items 10, 13, 14, 15, 18, 23, 29 & 30, and factor 3 consisted of items 12, 17, 20, 21, 22, 25, 31 & 32 (Weiner et al, 2018).…”
Section: Statistical Analysesmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…CFA assists in the reduction of measurement error and allows the comparison of a priori models at the latent factor level (Jackson et al, 2009;Atkinson et al, 2011). In the present study, there were three a priori models regarding the construct validity of the RCTQ: (i) the single-factor model yielded by the STOQ-9 results (Keizer et al, 2014), (ii) the bifactorial model, referring to the racing vs. crowded thoughts theoretical distinction (Piguet et al, 2010), and (iii) the three-factor model, based on the results obtained in healthy individuals (Weiner et al, 2018). For the single-factor model, the 34 items of the RCTQ were included in the analysis (model 1); for the bifactorial model (model 2), 17 items belonging to the 'racing' a priori factor, i.e., items 2, 5, 7, 8, 11, 12, 14, 17, 20, 21, 22, 25, 28, 30, 31, 32 & 34, and 17 items belonging to the 'crowded' a priori factor, i.e., items 1, 3,4,6,9,10,13,15,16,18,19,23,24,26,27,29,33, were included; for the three-factor model (model 3), factor 1 consisted of items 1, 2, 4, 5, 7, 8 & 9, factor 2 consisted of items 10, 13, 14, 15, 18, 23, 29 & 30, and factor 3 consisted of items 12, 17, 20, 21, 22, 25, 31 & 32 (Weiner et al, 2018).…”
Section: Statistical Analysesmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…The RCTQ is a 34-item self-report questionnaire that assesses racing thoughts during the past 24 h. Nine items of the RCTQ belong to the Subjective Thought Overactivation Questionnaire (STOQ; Keizer et al, 2014), of which 4 underwent very minor wording adaptations, whereas the remaining 25 items were developed by three experienced clinicians (GB, IK and LW) based on the six themes that emerged in the qualitative reports of patients (Keizer et al, 2014). Initially 17 items were con-ceived to refer to racing thoughts; they convey the notion of an accel-eration and an increased amount of thoughts that are linked to each other in a sequential manner (e.g., my thoughts race at 200 km/h); these thoughts are usually associated with positive emotions and are not perceived as being emotionally overwhelming.…”
Section: Racing and Crowded Thoughts Questionnaire (Rctq)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Further, our task design also allowed us to examine whether these switching components are differentially modulated when processing positive or negative emotional information [Hare et al, ; Piguet et al, ; Sagaspe et al, ]. Because these deficits might represent a common and specific trait across the mood disorder spectrum, underlying cognitive dysfunction in these patients independent of mood anomalies, we took a dimensional approach combining patients with different clinical symptoms, as recently recommended in order to extract valid research domain criteria surpassing diagnostic boundaries (http://www.nimh.nih.gov/research-priorities/rdoc/nimh-research-domain-criteria-rdoc.shtml, Narrow and Kuhl, ; Keizer et al, ; Vieta and Valentí, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%