SAE Technical Paper Series 1980
DOI: 10.4271/800845
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Subjective Evaluation and Vehicle Behavior in Lane-Change Maneuvers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to the kingpin inclination, the intersected point between the kingpin axis and the ground moves forward so that the aligning force is increased and the returnability is improved. The result of simulation of cornering with steer release is the same with the above simulation: the tires with the larger unload radius can enhance the handling and stability of automobile [6][7][8][9].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Due to the kingpin inclination, the intersected point between the kingpin axis and the ground moves forward so that the aligning force is increased and the returnability is improved. The result of simulation of cornering with steer release is the same with the above simulation: the tires with the larger unload radius can enhance the handling and stability of automobile [6][7][8][9].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…This indicates that with the increase of vertical stiffness lateral accelerate and yaw rate is stability earlier. So cornering with steer release performance is improvement [7,8]. Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, the subjective feelings of the driver, together with the objective metrics of vehicle handling, lay the basis for steering feel evaluation. The vehicle handling metrics are measured and analyzed against certain standards in proving ground tests, and the subjective feelings are rated according to the driver's experience in different tests (Data et al, 2002;Zhang et al, 2009;Matsushita et al, 1980). The evaluation methods stated above have many defects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%