1969
DOI: 10.1111/j.2517-6161.1969.tb00782.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Subjective Bayesian Models in Sampling Finite Populations

Abstract: Summary A general and basic model for inference about characteristics of a finite population of distinguishable elements is presented from a subjectivistic–Bayesian point of view. A subjectivist analogue to simple random sampling, based on the notion of exchangeable random variables, is discussed and the inputs and assumptions underlying the model are shown to involve nothing more than is required for inference under Bayesian models for infinite populations. The model is illustrated by a number of particular e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
131
0
2

Year Published

1974
1974
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 161 publications
(136 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
3
131
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Following the prescription of Ericson (1969), we "place a prior" on the population values {X 1 , . .…”
Section: Bayesian Analysis For Hypergeometric Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Following the prescription of Ericson (1969), we "place a prior" on the population values {X 1 , . .…”
Section: Bayesian Analysis For Hypergeometric Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Little (2004) provides an overview of the arguments and suggests that they can be reconciled from a Bayesian perspective. In fact, Ericson (1969) gave an explicit analysis of this relationship, showing the correspondence between simple random sampling in design-based inference and the use of an exchangeable distribution for the finite population values {X 1 , . .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…is minimized, where r is a prior distribution of lc and R ( k , 6) is the usual risk function (the expected value of the loss function) with respect to 6(x) for each x. Alinimizing (1.3) rather than r(6, T) is strictly valid only when the change in the order of integration is allowable and when all the appropriate integrals exist. However, this is not the case for the integrals encountered in this article.…”
Section: Decision Theoretic Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clearly, the distribution of the total summarizes several sources of uncertainty such as the sampling distribution and the prior distributions. (For details on model-based and design-based approaches, see Little 2004;Gregoire 1998;Sarndal et al 1992;Ericson 1969Ericson , 1988Basu 2011;Scott 1977;Binder 1982;Ghosh and Meeden 1997. ) We propose a model-based Bayesian approach appropriate for estimating totals based on samples collected using any type of sampling design.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%