2006
DOI: 10.1214/06-ba116
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Subjective Bayesian Analysis: Principles and Practice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
142
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 172 publications
(145 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
142
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The form of the prior can have important consequences on the resulting Bayes factor. As discussed in our third source (Dienes, 2011), there are two primary schools of Bayesian thought: default (objective) Bayes (Berger, 2006) and contextdependent (subjective) Bayes (Goldstein et al, 2006;. The default Bayesian tries to specify prior distributions that convey little information while maintaining certain desirable properties.…”
Section: Source: Rouder Et Al (2009) -Bayesian T-tests For Acceptingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The form of the prior can have important consequences on the resulting Bayes factor. As discussed in our third source (Dienes, 2011), there are two primary schools of Bayesian thought: default (objective) Bayes (Berger, 2006) and contextdependent (subjective) Bayes (Goldstein et al, 2006;. The default Bayesian tries to specify prior distributions that convey little information while maintaining certain desirable properties.…”
Section: Source: Rouder Et Al (2009) -Bayesian T-tests For Acceptingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such distributions are called objective or noninformative priors, one may refer to DeGroot and Schervish [8] and Press [9]. One may also refer to Berger [10] and Goldstein [11] for information about objective Bayesian versus subjective Bayesian analysis.…”
Section: Bayesian Analysis Using Phreg Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a comparison of the contrasting arguments see Berger (2006), Goldstein (2006) and the related discussion. The same proponents of the objective approach (Berger, Bernardo and Sun, 2009) remark however that the term "objective" means that it only depends on the model assumed and the data obtained, so that the kind of objectivity is simply the same of the frequentist statistics.…”
Section: Prior Probabilitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%