The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2021
DOI: 10.1007/s12652-021-03465-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Subject variability in sensor-based activity recognition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The elderly dataset was sampled in fixed-width sliding windows of 2 seconds and 50% overlap (100 readings/window). A full description of the used dataset can be found in section 4.1.1 of [48].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The elderly dataset was sampled in fixed-width sliding windows of 2 seconds and 50% overlap (100 readings/window). A full description of the used dataset can be found in section 4.1.1 of [48].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The third evaluation technique, usability evaluation, aims to investigate the quality of the synthetic data generated by the proposed architecture in improving the performance of activity recognition classification models. First, the synthetic data generated by both FCGAN architecture and Unified GAN is preprocessed to perform four experiments on it together with the real data using the best-performing deep learning classifiers by Jimale & Mohd Noor [48]. These experiments are experiments on 70% real data and 30% synthetic data, experiments on 50% real data and 50% synthetic data, experiments on 30% real data and 70% synthetic data, and experiments on 100% synthetic data.…”
Section: Usability Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various academic studies on classifying daily physical behavior in older adults have made significant contributions to the field [28], [29]. Specific studies focusing on Classifying Daily Physical Behavior in Older Adults have contributed significantly to the field.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, wearable sensors are better for recognizing human activities 5,6 . However, the recognition task is difficult due to the vast number of sensor modalities, noisy data, variances in the spatial and temporal dimensions of the feature space between people, 7 and also, the variability when a subject or different subjects perform the same task at various times, among other factors 8 . Examples of wearable sensors include accelerometers, gyroscopes, magnetometers, and others.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5,6 However, the recognition task is difficult due to the vast number of sensor modalities, noisy data, variances in the spatial and temporal dimensions of the feature space between people, 7 and also, the variability when a subject or different subjects perform the same task at various times, among other factors. 8 Examples of wearable sensors include accelerometers, gyroscopes, magnetometers, and others. Various machine learning models have been proposed to recognize the activities collected using these sensors; an example of such can be seen in Sani et al 9 where the authors used K-Nearest Neighbor for classification.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%