2019
DOI: 10.1002/cnm.3182
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Subject‐specific loads on the lumbar spine in detailed finite element models scaled geometrically and kinematic‐driven by radiography images

Abstract: Traditional load‐control musculoskeletal and finite element (FE) models of the spine fail to accurately predict in vivo intervertebral joint loads due mainly to the simplifications and assumptions when estimating redundant trunk muscle forces. An alternative powerful protocol that bypasses the calculation of muscle forces is to drive the detailed FE models by image‐based in vivo displacements. Development of subject‐specific models, however, both involves the risk of extensive radiation exposures while imaging… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
(116 reference statements)
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The disc pressure was approximately constant in the NP, and the mechanical response was governed mainly by the fluid pressure. This observation justified the use of cavity models in some studies to simulate the NP [27,47,64]. The predicted IDP in the NP under flexion and extension showed good agreement with the in vitro data measured by pressure transducers [63] (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…The disc pressure was approximately constant in the NP, and the mechanical response was governed mainly by the fluid pressure. This observation justified the use of cavity models in some studies to simulate the NP [27,47,64]. The predicted IDP in the NP under flexion and extension showed good agreement with the in vitro data measured by pressure transducers [63] (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Numerous efforts have been made in developing detailed biomechanical models of the spine based on rigid-body modelling (e.g., Abouhossein et al, 2011;Bruno et al, 2015;Han et al, 2012) or finite element method (e.g., Azari et al, 2018;Ghezelbash et al, 2016). In finite element studies, the complex structures of discs, ligaments and facet joints can be explicitly modelled in detail (Dehghan-Hamani et al, 2019;Khoddam-Khorasani et al, 2018), thereby enabling accurate kinetics analysis in various conditions. Nonetheless, the computational burden is significant (Ghezelbash et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to evaluate the outcome of the artificial disc, more biomechanical and patient specific data have to be gathered pre-and postimplantation. Some preliminary work in this direction has already been published [50].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%