2014 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP) 2014
DOI: 10.1109/icassp.2014.6854267
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Subject independent identification of breath sounds components using multiple classifiers

Abstract: Breath sounds have been shown very valuable for diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea. In this study, we present a subject independent method for automatic classification of breath and related sounds during sleep. An experienced operator manually labelled segments of breath sounds from 11 sleeping subjects as: inspiration, expiration, inspiratory snoring, expiratory snoring, wheezing, other noise, and non-audible. Ten features were extracted and fed into 3 different classifiers: naïve Bayes, Support Vector Mach… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
8
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Snores were automatically detected using an algorithm for breath sounds classification that has been previously described and validated against the human ear. 17 Briefly, in that study, a human operator, who was blinded to the machine score, manually annotated audio of breath sounds based on this definition: snoring is a harsh, low-pitched sound produced by tissue vibration during passage of air through a partially collapsed upper airway during sleep. 23,24 Separately, audio files were segmented into 64 ms, from each 10 acoustic variables (features) that were calculated to be used by the machine learning algorithm.…”
Section: Identification Of Snoresmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Snores were automatically detected using an algorithm for breath sounds classification that has been previously described and validated against the human ear. 17 Briefly, in that study, a human operator, who was blinded to the machine score, manually annotated audio of breath sounds based on this definition: snoring is a harsh, low-pitched sound produced by tissue vibration during passage of air through a partially collapsed upper airway during sleep. 23,24 Separately, audio files were segmented into 64 ms, from each 10 acoustic variables (features) that were calculated to be used by the machine learning algorithm.…”
Section: Identification Of Snoresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To overcome these limitations, we have developed a system to detect individual snores based on the acoustic nature of the breath sounds regardless of its amplitude solely. 17 This system is capable of accurately identifying individual snores, which are then quantified in order to evaluate their relationship to sleep apnea (both OSA and CSA). Machine learning algorithms have been deployed by other researchers for identifying snoring and examining snoring acoustic features in snorers with and without OSA, in a small set of participants.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bu senkronizasyon işleminin doğru şekilde yapılamaması, uzman doktorun teşhis koyma sürecinde hata yapmasına sebebiyet verebilir. İkinci problem ise, ortalama uyku süresinin 6-8 saat olmasından dolayı, uzman doktorun ses kaydının tamamını dinleyerek teşhis koyabilmesinin pratikte zor olmasıdır (Alshaer et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…Nefes alma, nefes verme, nefes alırken horlama, nefes verirken horlama, hırıltı, diğer sesler ve duyulamayan seslerden oluşan yedi farklı ses tipinin incelendiği diğer bir çalışmada elde edilen öznitelikler kullanılarak üç farklı sınıflandırıcı kullanılmıştır. Sonuçlara göre; uyku sesleri konusunda ikiden fazla parametrenin sınıflandırılması durumunda, en yüksek doğruluk oranının % 85.4 olarak elde edildiği bildirilmiştir (Alshaer et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…Methods belonging to Artificial Intelligence disciplines are used to identify respiratory events. K-Nearest Neighbour [OUD, M. & DOOIJES, E.H., 1996], Naive Bayes [ALSHAER, H. et al, 2014], Support Vector Machines [ALSHAER, H. et al, 2014], Random Forest [ALSHAER, H. et al, 2014], Neural Networks [YUAN, K. et al, 2011;PATEL, U., 2011;MASON, L., 2002] and Hidden Markov Models [SNIDER, B.R. & KAIN, A., 2013] are common techniques that have been proven to achieve good results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%