2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2015.05.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Subject identification via ECG fiducial-based systems: Influence of the type of QT interval correction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on the promising results presented in the paper, we envision that hubness-aware techniques will be used in further biomedical recognition tasks such as ECG-based person identification [7], diagnosis of schizophrenia [4] or link prediction in biomedical networks [27]. In order to accelerate this process,…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the promising results presented in the paper, we envision that hubness-aware techniques will be used in further biomedical recognition tasks such as ECG-based person identification [7], diagnosis of schizophrenia [4] or link prediction in biomedical networks [27]. In order to accelerate this process,…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Activation of the sympathetic system results in the reduction of the interbeat interval (temporal distance between consecutive R points) variability, and a width reduction in the P and T complexes due to an increase in conductivity [40]. Indeed, the time intervals among the fiducial points change with varying heart rate [40, 75]. However, the differences in the ECG morphology induced by different physiological conditions (e.g., exhaustion, stress, relaxation, and anxiety), would not compromise the performance accuracy of ECG-based biometric systems, if some kind of normalization regarding the heart rate was to be applied to the temporal distances between fiducial points [35, 36, 40, 69, 70, 75, 76].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These n decisions can be implemented in parallel if the number of users is high and several computational units are available. 2 At each of the above decisions, a simple decision threshold of 0.5 could be applied. It means that given a model trained to distinguish between the typing patterns of users u and v, if the model outputs less than 0.5 when a new time series is presented to the model, then the decision is u; otherwise the decision is v. However, the simple threshold of 0.5 may be suboptimal.…”
Section: Nearest Neighbour Regression With Error Correctionmentioning
confidence: 99%