2023
DOI: 10.1007/978-981-19-7528-8_29
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Subject Dependent Cognitive Load Level Classification from fNIRS Signal Using Support Vector Machine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 14 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The EEG data were classified by three deep learning subject-specific classifiers: convolutional neural network (CNN), long short-term memory network (LSTM), and convolutional LSTM network (Conv-LSTM) and reached the best accuracy of 97.92% from feature combination of phase locking value with CNN and Conv-LSTM. Recent work [ 26 ] utilized the SVM model to classify the two classes (high-low) of cognitive workload ( 0 -back vs 2 -back & 3 -back) with the highest accuracy of 94.44% and an average accuracy of 75.85% for a 50:50 train test ratio.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The EEG data were classified by three deep learning subject-specific classifiers: convolutional neural network (CNN), long short-term memory network (LSTM), and convolutional LSTM network (Conv-LSTM) and reached the best accuracy of 97.92% from feature combination of phase locking value with CNN and Conv-LSTM. Recent work [ 26 ] utilized the SVM model to classify the two classes (high-low) of cognitive workload ( 0 -back vs 2 -back & 3 -back) with the highest accuracy of 94.44% and an average accuracy of 75.85% for a 50:50 train test ratio.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%