2017
DOI: 10.1515/jgth-2017-0020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Subgroups of relatively hyperbolic groups of Bredon cohomological dimension 2

Abstract: Abstract. A remarkable result of Gersten states that the class of hyperbolic groups of cohomological dimension 2 is closed under taking finitely presented (or more generally FP 2 ) subgroups. We prove the analogous result for relatively hyperbolic groups of Bredon cohomological dimension 2 with respect to the family of parabolic subgroups. A class of groups where our result applies consists of C 0 .1=6/ small cancellation products. The proof relies on an algebraic approach to relative homological Dehn function… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(35 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Propositions 2.24 and 2.25 below can also be obtained from Theorem 4.4 and Proposition 4.10 of [Mar17], where the relative homological Dehn functions are studied. We include them here for completeness and ease of the reader.…”
Section: Homological Dehn Functionsmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Propositions 2.24 and 2.25 below can also be obtained from Theorem 4.4 and Proposition 4.10 of [Mar17], where the relative homological Dehn functions are studied. We include them here for completeness and ease of the reader.…”
Section: Homological Dehn Functionsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…For groups of type F P 2 some aspects of homological Dehn functions were studied in [Ger92,HM16,Mar17,FM18]. In this article, we unify all these results into a single framework by considering homological finite presentations (Definition 2.5).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The function FV G (k) can also be defined from algebraic considerations under the weaker assumption that G is F P 2 , see [12,Section 3]. Analogously, for a group G and a family of subgroups F with a cocompact model for E F G, there is relative homological Dehn function FV G,F (k) whose growth rate is an invariant of the pair (G, F), see [18,Theorem 4.5].…”
Section: Theorem 11 Was Known To Hold Ifmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An analogous characterisation for relatively hyperbolic groups is proved in [18, Theorem 1.11] relying on the following corollary. We remark that a converse of Corollary 1.5 requires an additional condition that {P λ } is an almost malnormal collection, see [18,Theorem 1.11(1) and Remark 1.13].…”
Section: Theorem 11 Was Known To Hold Ifmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The type of homological functions of Definition 1.2 have been considered in the contexts of relatively hyperbolic groups for example in [9,11,15]. Combining Theorems 1.6, 1.7 and 1.8 allows us to provide a characterization of relatively hyperbolic groups in terms of homological Dehn functions stated as Theorem 1.10 below.…”
Section: Definition 11 (Fine Graph)mentioning
confidence: 99%