2007
DOI: 10.1090/conm/432/08306
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Subgroups of mapping class groups from the geometrical viewpoint

Abstract: Once it is possible to translate any particular proof from one theory to another, then the analogy has ceased to be productive for this purpose; it would cease to be at all productive if at one point we had a meaningful and natural way of deriving both theories from a single one. . . . Gone is the analogy: gone are the two theories, their conflicts and their delicious reciprocal reflections, their furtive caresses, their inexplicable quarrels; alas, all is just one theory, whose majestic beauty can no longer e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A finitely generated subgroup Γ ≤ Mod(S) is convex cocompact if for some (any) x ∈ Teich(S), the Teichmüller space of the surface S, the orbit Γ · x ⊂ Teich(S) is quasiconvex with respect to the Teichmüller metric. (See the papers of Farb-Mosher [FM1] and KL4] for definitions and details). Similar to the situation described above, a subgroup Γ ≤ Mod(S) gives rise to a surface group extension 1 −→ π 1 (S) −→ E Γ −→ Γ −→ 1.…”
Section: Motivation From Surface Group Extensions and Some Previous Rmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A finitely generated subgroup Γ ≤ Mod(S) is convex cocompact if for some (any) x ∈ Teich(S), the Teichmüller space of the surface S, the orbit Γ · x ⊂ Teich(S) is quasiconvex with respect to the Teichmüller metric. (See the papers of Farb-Mosher [FM1] and KL4] for definitions and details). Similar to the situation described above, a subgroup Γ ≤ Mod(S) gives rise to a surface group extension 1 −→ π 1 (S) −→ E Γ −→ Γ −→ 1.…”
Section: Motivation From Surface Group Extensions and Some Previous Rmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although Teichmüller space itself is in no ordinary sense negatively curved (for example, [18,21]), a driving principle in the study of the coarse geometry of T (S) is that the thick part T has many hyperboliclike features. See, for example, [14]. One manifestation of this principle is Minsky's theorem that Teichmüller geodesics which remain in the thick part of Teichmüller space are strongly contracting.…”
Section: Necessity Of Quasiconvexity In A(γ) and The Proof Of Theoremmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [KL1,KL2], we extended Farb and Mosher's analogy, providing several characterizations of convex cocompactness borrowed from the Kleinian setting (see also Hamenstädt [H]). The analogy is an imperfect one, see [KL3] and the references there, and we point out some new imperfections here. i and yet f 1 , f 2 ∼ = F 2 is not a Schottky group.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%