Coastal Engineering 1988 1989
DOI: 10.1061/9780872626874.036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Subgrid Modelling in Depth Integrated Flows

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
3

Year Published

2003
2003
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
10
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This value has been selected based on Madsen et al . [] but, as it is the case for the bed roughness, should be calibrated with measurements for nonidealized applications. In ROMS, a 20 s baroclinic (three‐dimensional) time step is used with a mode‐splitting ratio of 10 leading to a barotropic (two‐dimensional) time stepping of 2 s.…”
Section: Model Setup and Analyzed Casesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This value has been selected based on Madsen et al . [] but, as it is the case for the bed roughness, should be calibrated with measurements for nonidealized applications. In ROMS, a 20 s baroclinic (three‐dimensional) time step is used with a mode‐splitting ratio of 10 leading to a barotropic (two‐dimensional) time stepping of 2 s.…”
Section: Model Setup and Analyzed Casesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bed friction was computed assuming the “law of the wall.” Bed-roughness lengths were chosen as 0.02 cm over sandy areas and 0.78 cm over the oyster reefs, according to [22]. Eddy viscosity was set to 0.05 m 2 /s, based on Madsen et al [23]. To simulate the salinity ranges observed, the model boundaries were forced with a tidal wave at the southern boundary and constant fresh-water discharge of 5, 10 and 20 m 3 /s at the northern boundary.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike most estuaries and coastal shallow flow studies, the water depth (h) in contact tanks is generally much larger than the grid size (Áx), and the eddy viscosity is much more important in predicting the flow pattern (Madsen et al, 1988).…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it should be noted that the constant C s differs from the value established for three-dimensional flows. Madsen et al (1988) suggested that C s should be in the range of 0.4 to 0.8. Difference Schemes for Advection Terms.…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%