1988
DOI: 10.1016/s0167-5060(08)70797-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Subgraph Counts in Random Graphs Using Incomplete U-statistics methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The number of subgraphs isomorphic to G and containing a fixed edge, is given by n − 2 l − 2 2k a (l − 2)! , see [NW88], p.307. Therefore we can estimate…”
Section: Now We Can State Our Resultmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The number of subgraphs isomorphic to G and containing a fixed edge, is given by n − 2 l − 2 2k a (l − 2)! , see [NW88], p.307. Therefore we can estimate…”
Section: Now We Can State Our Resultmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…because lim n→∞ VZ = 1, see [NW88]. We need Lemma 4.1 to bound d(n): d(n) Now we consider an upper bound for the upper tail P (W − EW ≥ ε EW ) = P Z ≥ ε EW cn,p .…”
Section: Now We Can State Our Resultmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Using Stein's method [16], Barbour, Karoński and Ruciński [2] obtained strong quantitative bounds on the error in the central limit theorem for subgraph counts. A technique from the asymptotic theory of statistics, known as U-statistics, was applied by Nowicki and Wierman [13] to obtain a central limit theorem for subgraph counts, although, in a slightly less general setting than the theorem of Ruciński. Janson [8] used a similar method with several applications, including central limit theorems for the joint distribution of various graph statistics.…”
Section: Central Limit Theoremsmentioning
confidence: 99%