Recent pathological, clinical, and biomechanical evidence questions the validity of the shaken baby syndrome (SBS), usually diagnosed by finding the triad of retinal hemorrhage, encephalopathy, and subdural hemorrhage (SDH) in infants.
Retinal hemorrhages have many other causes and are more common after the occurrence of natural disease and accidents than inflicted injury. Encephalopathy results from hypoxic‐ischemic injury rather than traumatic axonal injury.
Trauma is a common cause of infant SDH, but there are other causes and a quarter of normal births are associated with SDH on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan.
SDH is usually a thin bilateral film, and its source is traditionally ascribed to torn bridging veins. This is unproven and rarely documented. The dura is an alternative source; bleeding into the dura is common in asphyxiated infants. SDH evolves into a reactive membrane containing thin‐walled capillaries. Recurrent bleeding into these membranes is seen on microscopy. Some SDH evolves into chronic fluid collections, the causes for which are unknown.
Biomechanical studies have failed to show that shaking can cause SDH. The forces generated by shaking are far less than those resulting from impact, including low‐level falls.
The importance of considering the birth and early clinical history when examining a case of suspected abuse in emphasized.