2018
DOI: 10.1029/2018tc005211
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Subduction Zones Interaction Around the Adria Microplate and the Origin of the Apenninic Arc

Abstract: The study of slab-slab interactions has come to the front of geodynamics researches to explain geological and geophysical observations from tectonically complex areas. Here we aim to better understand the geodynamics of the Central Mediterranean, where the Adria plate subducts on its two opposite sides. Additionally, the slab below the Central South Apennines has been progressively breaking off during the last 3 Myr. The role of a slab window in a single slab or in an outward dipping double-sided subduction sy… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
28
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
(131 reference statements)
2
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4b) and thus do not support this hypothesis; on the contrary, here it is possible to assume that the supra European slab space is large enough to host the eastward mantle flow coming from beneath the Apennines (Fig. 8), which is in agreement also with previous possible flow scenarios (Király et al, 2018, and references therein).…”
Section: Comparison With Tomography: Relationships With Slabs and Circum-alpine Seismic Anomaliessupporting
confidence: 87%
“…4b) and thus do not support this hypothesis; on the contrary, here it is possible to assume that the supra European slab space is large enough to host the eastward mantle flow coming from beneath the Apennines (Fig. 8), which is in agreement also with previous possible flow scenarios (Király et al, 2018, and references therein).…”
Section: Comparison With Tomography: Relationships With Slabs and Circum-alpine Seismic Anomaliessupporting
confidence: 87%
“…It is worth noting that their boundary between AD and EU is further north than ours. If confirmed by other data, this would imply two oppositely dipping subduction zones (Király et al, 2018) and should lead to a re-analysis of the other datasets. The fragmentation of the Moho, leading to our MO2 model, was suggested based on the analysis of the seismic data of the CELEBRATION andALP 2002 experiments (Behm et al, 2007) and supported by the elastic plate modeling of Brückl et al (2010), gravimetric, geodetic, and seismicity pieces of evidence (Brückl, 2011).…”
Section: Comparison Between Mo1 and Mo2mentioning
confidence: 56%
“…The counterclockwise rotation of Africa since the Cretaceous is a key indicator for the larger amount of subducted oceanic lithosphere in the east compared to the west. At present, the eastern and western Mediterranean are separated by the about 300 km wide, continental remnant of the Adriatic microplate that, on its general northwestward path (e.g., Platt & Vissers, 1989), has been colliding with Eurasia to form the Alps, the Dinarides, and northern Hellenides (Figure 1; Carminati & Doglioni, 2012; Handy et al., 2015; Király et al., 2018; Rosenbaum & Lister, 2004; van Hinsbergen et al., 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%