2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.lithos.2018.02.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Subduction of Proterozoic to Late Triassic continental basement in the Guatemala suture zone: A petrological and geochronological study of high-pressure metagranitoids from the Chuacús complex

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The timing of eclogite facies metamorphism in the Chuacús Complex has been dated with the Lu‐Hf method on garnet and whole‐rock aliquots from eclogite at 101 ± 3 and 95 ± 2 Ma, whereas zircon, monazite and titanite U–Pb ages indicate later‐stage events at c. 80–74 Ma (Maldonado, Weber, et al, 2018). Zircon dating of meta‐granitoids associated with eclogites showed protolith ages of c. 1.1–1.0 Ga and c. 224 Ma (Maldonado, Ortega‐Gutiérrez et al, 2018; Solari et al, 2011). Tectonic reconstructions for the Cretaceous period suggest proximity between the southern CMC and the Chuacús Complex during the evolution of the Caribbean region, as both comprised the southern portion of the Maya Block (Maldonado, Ortega‐Gutiérrez, et al, 2018; Maldonado, Weber, et al, 2018; Martens et al, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The timing of eclogite facies metamorphism in the Chuacús Complex has been dated with the Lu‐Hf method on garnet and whole‐rock aliquots from eclogite at 101 ± 3 and 95 ± 2 Ma, whereas zircon, monazite and titanite U–Pb ages indicate later‐stage events at c. 80–74 Ma (Maldonado, Weber, et al, 2018). Zircon dating of meta‐granitoids associated with eclogites showed protolith ages of c. 1.1–1.0 Ga and c. 224 Ma (Maldonado, Ortega‐Gutiérrez et al, 2018; Solari et al, 2011). Tectonic reconstructions for the Cretaceous period suggest proximity between the southern CMC and the Chuacús Complex during the evolution of the Caribbean region, as both comprised the southern portion of the Maya Block (Maldonado, Ortega‐Gutiérrez, et al, 2018; Maldonado, Weber, et al, 2018; Martens et al, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Late Triassic–Middle Jurassic cooling of the OC is coeval with the break‐up of Pangea (including also the initial opening of the Gulf of Mexico during the Jurassic; e.g. Bird & Burke, 2006; Cochrane et al., 2014; Maldonado, Ortega‐Gutiérrez, & Ortíz‐Joya, 2018; Martini & Ortega‐Gutiérrez, 2018; Michalzik, 1991; Spikings et al., 2015; Steiner, 2005). In the southern and south‐eastern parts of Mexico, there is no reported magmatic evidence for the break‐up of Pangea during the Late Triassic.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Palaeogeographic model displaying the initial rupture of Pangea during the Late Triassic (modified after Cochrane et al., 2014; Maldonado et al., 2018; Spikings et al., 2015)…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Farther south, in tectonic contact along the Baja Verapaz Shear Zone (Ortega-Obregón et al, 2008), the Jacalteco terrane is mostly made up by the Chuacús Complex, containing Precambrian to Triassic metamorphic protoliths, and affected by ca. 218 Ma decompression melting and migmatization and Late Cretaceous high-pressure metamorphism (Ortega-Gutiérrez et al, 2004;Ratschbacher et al, 2009;Solari et al, 2011;Maldonado et al, 2018). South of the Motagua fault the Sula terrane is a completely different entity, made up almost entirely by the Las Ovejas Complex (Torres de León et al, 2012), characterized by medium to high-grade metasediments (Paleozoic to Jurassic protolith ages) metamorphosed under high temperature-low pressure during the Oligocene, and associated with Jurassic to Cretaceous plutons, with or without deformation (e.g., Ratschbacher et al, 2009).…”
Section: Geologic Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%