Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2020
DOI: 10.1029/2019gc008862
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Subduction Duration and Slab Dip

Abstract: The dip angles of slabs are among the clearest characteristics of subduction zones, but the factors that control them remain obscure. Here, slab dip angles and subduction parameters, including subduction duration, the nature of the overriding plate, slab age, and convergence rate, are determined for 153 transects along subduction zones for the present day. We present a comprehensive tabulation of subduction duration based on isotopic ages of arc initiation and stratigraphic, structural, plate tectonic and seis… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
33
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 115 publications
(195 reference statements)
1
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Deep slab dips (~300‐km depth) do not appear to correlate strongly with regional subduction parameters (e.g., Cruciani et al, 2005; Jarrard, 1986; Lallemand et al, 2005); there is no deep slab dip correlation with slab age (buoyancy) (Figure 1b) and a relatively minor correlation with convergence rate (Figure 1c) and absolute upper plate velocity. Interestingly, shallow slab dips exhibit an inverse correlation with subduction duration (Hu & Gurnis, 2020; Jarrard, 1986) and overriding plate thickness/type (e.g., Holt, Buffett et al, 2015; Hu & Gurnis, 2020), but these correlations do not persist to the deep slab depths considered here. It is therefore reasonable to ask whether global‐scale mantle flow plays a significant role in controlling deep slab dip.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Deep slab dips (~300‐km depth) do not appear to correlate strongly with regional subduction parameters (e.g., Cruciani et al, 2005; Jarrard, 1986; Lallemand et al, 2005); there is no deep slab dip correlation with slab age (buoyancy) (Figure 1b) and a relatively minor correlation with convergence rate (Figure 1c) and absolute upper plate velocity. Interestingly, shallow slab dips exhibit an inverse correlation with subduction duration (Hu & Gurnis, 2020; Jarrard, 1986) and overriding plate thickness/type (e.g., Holt, Buffett et al, 2015; Hu & Gurnis, 2020), but these correlations do not persist to the deep slab depths considered here. It is therefore reasonable to ask whether global‐scale mantle flow plays a significant role in controlling deep slab dip.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Coupled with data from adjacent rocks (Hacker & Mosenfelder, 1996), our new thermobarometric results nominally support this interpretation: within the top 12 m of Wadi Tayin sole, peak metamorphic conditions spatially transition from 800–900°C and 11–13 kbar (Cowan et al, 2014; Soret et al, 2017) to 665 ± 32°C and 7.5 ± 1.2 kbar (Figure 6). If this pressure is assumed to have been lithostatic, this implies ~15 km of missing and/or condensed section; given that most shallow subduction zones have dips on the order of 20–25° (Hu & Gurnis, 2020), this implies materials derived from ~40 km apart on a subducting slab. We note that the peak P‐T changes documented by Hacker and Mosenfelder (1996) occur downsection through amphibolites with roughly similar major‐element bulk compositions (Ishikawa et al, 2005), suggesting that sole rocks with common protoliths may have undergone a range of P–T paths.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fourth one is the trench retreat, commonly attributed as an important reason for slab stagnation (Christensen, 1996; van der Hilst & Seno, 1993;Zhong & Gurnis, 1995). Some recent studies suggest the potential role of former subduction (Hu & Gurnis, 2020;Liu et al, 2021), but the dynamic nature remains elusive. There is still no systematic evaluation of these effects using a data-driven thermal-chemical modeling framework.East Asia is an ideal location for studying subduction dynamics and slab stagnation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%