2022
DOI: 10.1002/essoar.10510507.1
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Subduction and obduction processes: the fate of oceanic lithosphere revealed by blueschists, eclogites and ophiolites

Abstract: Fragments of former oceans are commonly observed in mountain belts: blueschists and eclogites, on the one hand, and ophiolites, on the other hand, are all that remains of ancient oceanic lithosphere. Though volumetrically subordinate, they provide essential insights into past geodynamics and into the processes involved in the formation and destruction of oceanic lithosphere. This contribution apprehends these two types of oceanic fragments jointly and shows the advantage of doing so for understanding the dynam… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Magmatic rocks with SSZ affinity (expected in ophiolites formed during subduction initiation; Agard et al., 2023; Stern et al., 2012), exposed in the Southern Coast Ranges (McLaughlin et al., 1988) only occur as blocks within the TCSM and have middle Jurassic ages (Shervais, Murchey, et al., 2005). The SSZ affinities of high‐grade blocks in the Franciscan (this study; Ghatak et al., 2012; Saha et al., 2005; Wakabayashi et al., 2010) needs however to be explained, as SSZ rocks are initially formed above a subduction zone, then metamorphosed at high‐grade in a subduction zone.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Magmatic rocks with SSZ affinity (expected in ophiolites formed during subduction initiation; Agard et al., 2023; Stern et al., 2012), exposed in the Southern Coast Ranges (McLaughlin et al., 1988) only occur as blocks within the TCSM and have middle Jurassic ages (Shervais, Murchey, et al., 2005). The SSZ affinities of high‐grade blocks in the Franciscan (this study; Ghatak et al., 2012; Saha et al., 2005; Wakabayashi et al., 2010) needs however to be explained, as SSZ rocks are initially formed above a subduction zone, then metamorphosed at high‐grade in a subduction zone.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rocks metamorphosed in subduction zones are thought to commonly undergo a rapid increase of pressure, accompanied by an increase of temperature, albeit only limited (typically in the order of 8°C·km −1 , e.g., Agard et al, 2022; Ernst, 2001; Miyashiro, 1972; Penniston‐Dorland et al, 2015). However, the apparent absence of a temperature increase during compression for our sample seems incompatible with this classic view and may question the tectonic significance of (U)HP metamorphism.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By contrast with these continental eclogites, the oceanic eclogites and related rocks appear to have been returned from maximum pressures of less than ∼ 2.8 GPa (Agard et al, 2018). Processes related to the subduction and obduction of ocean lithosphere during the Phanerozoic were reviewed earlier this year by Agard et al (2023), and the processes by which subduction zones formed during the Cenozoic, from initiation to self-sustained subduction, were reviewed recently by Lallemand and Arcay (2021); consequently, these processes are not considered in detail herein. Lastly, I include only brief comments about xenolithic eclogites, where essential to the discussion, because they also are the subject of a recently published review (Aulbach and Smart, 2023).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%