2020
DOI: 10.1002/gj.3883
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Subduction and exhumation of Luliangshan eclogite in the North Qaidam, northern Tibet: Constraints from petrology, geochemistry and phase equilibrium modelling

Abstract: Eclogites in the high‐pressure (HP) and ultrahigh‐pressure (UHP) belt record important information about the subduction process and evolution history of the orogenic belt. The Luliangshan eclogites surrounded by granitic gneiss or paragneiss as lenses are exposed in the western segment of the North Qaidam UHP metamorphic belt, northwestern China. Petrology, mineral chemistry, and P–T pseudosection modelling show that the eclogites have experienced a multi‐stage metamorphic process. The peak eclogite‐facies met… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 90 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Whole‐rock Sr‐Nd isotopic composition is also an important geochemical discrimination tool to constrain the protolith of metamorphic rocks (Li et al, 2020; Peng, Yu, Li, Zhang, et al, 2019; Yu et al, 2013). In this study, the retrograde eclogite shows positive ε Nd (t) values of 3.4 to 4.2 at 226 Ma (Table 2), which are similar to those of ophiolitic suites and oceanic seamount sequences in the Paleo‐Tethyan domain (Wang et al, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whole‐rock Sr‐Nd isotopic composition is also an important geochemical discrimination tool to constrain the protolith of metamorphic rocks (Li et al, 2020; Peng, Yu, Li, Zhang, et al, 2019; Yu et al, 2013). In this study, the retrograde eclogite shows positive ε Nd (t) values of 3.4 to 4.2 at 226 Ma (Table 2), which are similar to those of ophiolitic suites and oceanic seamount sequences in the Paleo‐Tethyan domain (Wang et al, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%