2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.cma.2004.06.047
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Subdomain-based flux-free a posteriori error estimators

Abstract: A new residual-type flux-free error estimator is presented. It computes upper and lower bounds of the error in energy norm with the ultimate goal of obtaining bounds for outputs of interest. The proposed approach precludes the main drawbacks of standard residual type estimators circumventing the need of flux-equilibration and resulting in a simple implementation that uses standard resources available in finite element codes. This is especially interesting for existing codes and 3D applications where the implem… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
171
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 100 publications
(179 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(75 reference statements)
2
171
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As shown in [11] the bounds for the quantity of interest are not robust with respect to the advection parameter, since the effectivities of the bounds deteriorate as the advection term becomes dominant. In this work, sharper bounds which alleviate this behavior have been obtained combining stabilization techniques along with goal-oriented adaptivity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…As shown in [11] the bounds for the quantity of interest are not robust with respect to the advection parameter, since the effectivities of the bounds deteriorate as the advection term becomes dominant. In this work, sharper bounds which alleviate this behavior have been obtained combining stabilization techniques along with goal-oriented adaptivity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proposed strategies are an extension of the flux-free technique presented in [11] and the hybrid-flux technique presented in [10]. The flux-free estimates yield much sharper bounds than the hybrid-flux approach both for the stabilized and non-stabilized approaches.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations