2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2009.09.038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Subdiffraction-Limit Two-Photon Fluorescence Microscopy for GFP-Tagged Cell Imaging

Abstract: We report applications of two-photon excitation fluorescence (2PEF) microscopy with subdiffraction-limit resolution for green-fluorescent-protein-tagged cell imaging. The microscope integrates 2PEF microscopy and stimulated emission depletion microscopy in one microscope that has the benefits of both techniques: intrinsic three-dimensional resolution, confined photobleaching, and subdiffraction-limit resolution. The subdiffraction-limit resolution was demonstrated by resolving green-fluorescent-protein-tagged … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…STED has been shown to work in thicker tissue sections such as brain slices (Ding et al, 2009). A combination of 2-photon excitation and pulsed STED de-excitation, as previously shown (Li et al, 2009), should extend depth penetration even further without sacrificing spatial resolution. A unique advantage of STED over other nanoscopy techniques is its potential for targeted and tunable photoactivation or uncaging at nanoscale dimensions, possibly allowing the instant creation of high concentrations of physiologically relevant molecules at predefined locations in biological tissues.…”
Section: Comparison With Other Nanoscopy Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…STED has been shown to work in thicker tissue sections such as brain slices (Ding et al, 2009). A combination of 2-photon excitation and pulsed STED de-excitation, as previously shown (Li et al, 2009), should extend depth penetration even further without sacrificing spatial resolution. A unique advantage of STED over other nanoscopy techniques is its potential for targeted and tunable photoactivation or uncaging at nanoscale dimensions, possibly allowing the instant creation of high concentrations of physiologically relevant molecules at predefined locations in biological tissues.…”
Section: Comparison With Other Nanoscopy Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…63 The 2P-p-STED microscopy was first demonstrated by resolving GFP-tagged caveolar vesicles in a chemically fixed CHO cell. 64 A simplified version of 2P-p-STED that uses a single laser line for both 2P excitation and 1P depletion was also demonstrated recently for 4-(dicyanomethylene)-2-methyl-6-(p-dimethylaminostyryl)-4H-pyran (DCM) dyes. 65 The possibility of using this setup in cellular imaging was demonstrated by imaging the antibody-ATTO 647N-labeled microtubules in fixed PtK2 cells.…”
Section: Sted Microscopy With Two-photon Excitationmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Subsequently, two-photon STED (using pulsed two-photon excitation and pulsed single-photon quenching) was developed for imaging GFP [59], and two-photon STED time-lapse imaging of neural structures was demonstrated in acute brain slices [50,52]. Notably, the latter two studies achieved a resolution of 50 nm some 50 lm below tissue surface using long-working distance water objectives, facilitating the combination of STED microscopy with neurophysiological approaches.…”
Section: Two-photon Excitation Sted Microscopymentioning
confidence: 99%