1997
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0142(19970415)79:8<1635::aid-cncr30>3.0.co;2-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Subcutaneously implanted central venous access devices in cancer patients

Abstract: Subcutaneous intravenous access ports in cancer patients are safe and well tolerated. Long term device duration is primarily influenced by patient survival. In this study, 90% of patients alive at 1 year and 70% of patients alive at 4 years had a functional port.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

7
54
1
4

Year Published

1999
1999
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 134 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
7
54
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The port infection rate in the related literature ranges from 2.6% to 9% (7,12). Our infection rates are similar to the rates reported by interventional radiological and in a large surgical series (7).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The port infection rate in the related literature ranges from 2.6% to 9% (7,12). Our infection rates are similar to the rates reported by interventional radiological and in a large surgical series (7).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The most common pathogen for needle access site infections is Staphylococcus epidermidis (13). Port pocket infection is reported to occur at a rate of 0.3% to 4.4% (12). The port, as the source of the infection, should be removed immediately, and local wound care, along with oral antibiotic treatment, should be administered as soon as possible.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The current finding was consistent partially with Pires and Vasques entitled "nurse's knowledge regarding the handling of the totally-implanted venous access device" who mentioned that their knowledge regarding the implanted port is inadequate and concluded, therefore, that there is an urgent need for professional training [13]. Although studies regarding the complications that are related to the implantable port catheter are encountered in the literature, there exists no study that aims to measure the knowledge levels of nurses about these complications [14][15][16][17]. Consequently, education about implantable port catheter care does not exist in the curricula of all undergraduate nursing programs in Egypt.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…The occlusion of catheter was easy to recognize, forinfusion and withdrawal of blood from the system was not possible. It occurs in 1.9-8.0% of cases, whose cause is clotted blood [9,[12][13][14]. There wasa rare of 2.1% of complete occlusion in our institute.Kurul reported a catheter tip that rubs against the vein can produce a local thrombosis [14,15].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%