2017
DOI: 10.1002/mus.25409
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Subcutaneous versus intravenous immunoglobulin for chronic autoimmune neuropathies: A meta‐analysis

Abstract: The efficacy of SC-Ig is similar to IVIg for CIDP and MMN and has a significant safety profile. Muscle Nerve 55: 802-809, 2017.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

4
53
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
4
53
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, immunoglobulin G level monitoring might be helpful in establishing optimum treatment management . Subcutaneous immunoglobulins have recently been proposed as an alternative treatment for MMN and CIDP . Their use was not common in our study but things may have changed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Thus, immunoglobulin G level monitoring might be helpful in establishing optimum treatment management . Subcutaneous immunoglobulins have recently been proposed as an alternative treatment for MMN and CIDP . Their use was not common in our study but things may have changed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Twenty of 29 participants said that they preferred subcutaneous to intravenous immunoglobulin. A recent meta-analysis concluded that subcutaneous and intravenous immunoglobulin are equally effective in CIDP and in multifocal motor neuropathy (Racosta 2016). The ongoing Van Schaik 2016 RCT is also investigating the efficacy of subcutaneous immunoglobulin and the next updates of Eftimov 2013 and this overview will include this trial.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Long‐term subcutaneous immunoglobulin (LT‐SCIg) is a safe, effective, and tolerable alternative therapy in patients with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) . The lower profile of side effects when compared with intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) and its comparable clinical efficacy, together with lower direct (drugs for premedication, health‐care professional time) and indirect costs (eg, loss of working time for the patient/caregiver, transport), make this treatment widely accepted and well tolerated, even for long‐term treatment. The large PATH trial in CIDP patients demonstrated that LT‐SCIg for 24 weeks can be used as a maintenance treatment in patients with CIDP .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%