2018
DOI: 10.1080/21623945.2018.1525252
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Subcutaneous adipose tissue accumulation protects systemic glucose tolerance and muscle metabolism

Abstract: The protective effects of lower body subcutaneous adiposity are linked to the depot functioning as a "metabolic sink" receiving and sequestering excess lipid. This postulate, however, is based on indirect evidence. Mechanisms that mediate this protection are unknown. Here we directly examined this with progressive subcutaneous adipose tissue removal. Ad libitum chow fed mice underwent sham surgery, unilateral or bilateral removal of inguinal adipose tissue or bilateral removal of both inguinal and dorsal adipo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
31
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
0
31
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Other research shows that removal of subcutaneous tissue through liposuction had no long-term effect on metabolic risk factors for coronary heart disease in obese women (65) and in one study even worsened postprandial blood lipid concentrations (66). These findings are supported and extended by research on murine models, where surgical removal of subcutaneous adipose tissue from high VAT animals caused a decrease in glucose tolerance and insulin sensitivity (67, 68). Reversely, transplanting of subcutaneous tissue into high VAT animals resulted in alleviation of diet induced metabolic disease (67, 69, 70).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…Other research shows that removal of subcutaneous tissue through liposuction had no long-term effect on metabolic risk factors for coronary heart disease in obese women (65) and in one study even worsened postprandial blood lipid concentrations (66). These findings are supported and extended by research on murine models, where surgical removal of subcutaneous adipose tissue from high VAT animals caused a decrease in glucose tolerance and insulin sensitivity (67, 68). Reversely, transplanting of subcutaneous tissue into high VAT animals resulted in alleviation of diet induced metabolic disease (67, 69, 70).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…It is known that the different depots of white adipose tissue have different biology and functions, with increments in the visceral adipose tissue (VAT) being strongly linked to adipocyte dysfunction, insulin resistance, and metabolic syndrome . On the other hand, subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT, or also known as SQ WAT) is recognized for its greater capacity to store lipids and its contribution to proper glucose homeostasis . SAT buffers the excess fat, which otherwise would be toxic if in the circulation and accumulated ectopically or in VAT .…”
Section: Leptin and The Adipose Tissuementioning
confidence: 99%
“…85,86 On the other hand, subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT, or also known as SQ WAT) is recognized for its greater capacity to store lipids and its contribution to proper glucose homeostasis. 87 SAT buffers the excess fat, which otherwise would be toxic if in the circulation and accumulated ectopically or in VAT. 88 Consistently, insulin resistance is associated with lower levels of circulating leptin and reduced adipogenic capacity in the SAT of obese individuals, compared to insulin sensitive subjects.…”
Section: Leptin and The Adipose Tissuementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Obesity is the primary disease of adipocytes and is a prominent risk factor for the development of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), cardiovascular disease, and certain cancers. However, some people with obesity are metabolically healthy (Stefan et al, 2018) and it is well-established that subcutaneous fat can have protective roles against metabolic dysfunction (Booth et al, 2018). Mouse models and humans with reduced growth hormone (GH) signaling have increased subcutaneous adiposity but improved metabolic health (Berryman et al, 2004;Coschigano et al, 2003;Dominici et al, 2002;Guevara-Aguirre et al, 2020a, 2020b.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%