2017
DOI: 10.1002/jgt.22116
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Subcubic Edge‐Chromatic Critical Graphs Have Many Edges

Abstract: We consider graphs G with ∆ = 3 such that χ ′ (G) = 4 and χ ′ (G − e) = 3 for every edge e, so-called critical graphs. Jakobsen noted that the Petersen graph with a vertex deleted, P * , is such a graph and has average degree only 2 + 2 3 . He showed that every critical graph has average degree at least 2 + 2 3 , and asked if P * is the only graph where equality holds. We answer his question affirmatively. Our main result is that every subcubic critical graph, other than P * , has average degree at least 2 + 2… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
28
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
(30 reference statements)
2
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Conjecture (1) states that every 3‐critical graph has average degree at least α1=8/3; as mentioned earlier, this was proved by Jakobsen . Cranston and Rabern recently proved Conjecture (2), which states that if G is a 3‐critical graph different from P*, then a(G)α2=46/172.706. Using a computer, they also made an attempt on Conjecture (3), proving that if G is 3‐critical and not P* nor of the form P2*, then a(G)84/312.710.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Conjecture (1) states that every 3‐critical graph has average degree at least α1=8/3; as mentioned earlier, this was proved by Jakobsen . Cranston and Rabern recently proved Conjecture (2), which states that if G is a 3‐critical graph different from P*, then a(G)α2=46/172.706. Using a computer, they also made an attempt on Conjecture (3), proving that if G is 3‐critical and not P* nor of the form P2*, then a(G)84/312.710.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Let p(G)=max{p(w):w0.33emis0.33emnormala0.33emrich0.33emvertex0.33emof0.33emG}. The following result was proved in Cranston and Rabern , Lemma 5.…”
Section: Poor Subgraphs Proof Of the Theoremmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 3 more Smart Citations