1996
DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-1007244
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Subclinical Hepatic Encephalopathy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
51
0
8

Year Published

2003
2003
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 109 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
3
51
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…23,39 The prevalence of MHE has been reported to vary between 30% and 84% in patients with liver cirrhosis. 40 The major difficulty in diagnosing MHE has been not having a precisely defined gold standard for determining this disorder. The large variation in prevalence found in different studies is related to the criteria used to diagnose MHE and to the patient populations studied.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…23,39 The prevalence of MHE has been reported to vary between 30% and 84% in patients with liver cirrhosis. 40 The major difficulty in diagnosing MHE has been not having a precisely defined gold standard for determining this disorder. The large variation in prevalence found in different studies is related to the criteria used to diagnose MHE and to the patient populations studied.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14 The prevalence of MHE in patients with cirrhosis who do not have the evidence of overt HE is high and has been reported to vary between 30% and 84%. 2,10,15 Large variability in these studies were due to different diagnostic criteria used and population studied. Prevalence of MHE in our population varies between 48% and 67.7% as shown by our previous studies using psychometric tests.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The prevalence of MHE in other studies varies between 30% and 84% in cirrohosis. [12][13][14] This wide variation in the prevalence is due to several factors which includes 1) the criteria for diagnosis, 2) the population studied including the age, education 3) the severity of liver dysfunction, 4) alcoholic etiologyduration and severity and 5) presence of porto-systemic shunts. 15 Study of cordoba et al showed that neurocognitive impairment was observed even in patients with normal liver function due to presence of spontaneous porto-systemic shunts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%