1982
DOI: 10.1046/j.1537-2995.1982.22382224954.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Subclinical hemolytic disease of the newborn associated with IgG anti‐ Lub

Abstract: An anti‐Lub antibody with a titer of 128 to 256 was found in a pregnant woman. The antibody was IgG of the IgG1 subclass. Two newborns of successive pregnancies were free of clinical hemolytic disease of the newborn. The failure of this antibody to cause clinical hemolytic disease is ascribed to the weak expression of the Lub antigen on cord red blood cells.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 11 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Lu a /Lu b (LU1/LU2) blood group antigen polymorphism is determined by an SNP resulting in the presence of histidine (H) or arginine (R), respectively, at amino acid 77 of the first predicted N‐terminal IgSF domain (El Nemer et al , 1997). Lutheran blood group system antibodies have been reported to be involved in mild delayed haemolytic transfusion reactions (Daniels, 2002) but are rarely involved in HDFN (Inderbitzen et al , 1982) and are not generally considered to be clinically important (Dube & Zoes, 1982; Boulton, 1990). We have studied the recombinant Lutheran protein here as an example of a single‐pass type I membrane protein.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Lu a /Lu b (LU1/LU2) blood group antigen polymorphism is determined by an SNP resulting in the presence of histidine (H) or arginine (R), respectively, at amino acid 77 of the first predicted N‐terminal IgSF domain (El Nemer et al , 1997). Lutheran blood group system antibodies have been reported to be involved in mild delayed haemolytic transfusion reactions (Daniels, 2002) but are rarely involved in HDFN (Inderbitzen et al , 1982) and are not generally considered to be clinically important (Dube & Zoes, 1982; Boulton, 1990). We have studied the recombinant Lutheran protein here as an example of a single‐pass type I membrane protein.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%