1980
DOI: 10.1016/0002-9610(80)90351-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Subclavicular approach to first rib resection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
2
1

Year Published

1986
1986
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
2
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…While the susceptibility of the Adson test remained at 27% in some series, Murphy reported a 100% positive response to the it [28]; in our study, this rate was 86.5%. False positivity is much lower in the Adson test than in the costoclavicular test and hyperabduction test [28,29]: Rayan reported a false positive rate of 13.5% for the Adson test and 47% for the costoclavicular test in a study in 200 extremities of 100 volunteers [29]. Pleva reported a false positive rate of 62% for the hyperabduction test and 11% for the Adson test in a study of 53 medical students with no symptoms [30].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 49%
“…While the susceptibility of the Adson test remained at 27% in some series, Murphy reported a 100% positive response to the it [28]; in our study, this rate was 86.5%. False positivity is much lower in the Adson test than in the costoclavicular test and hyperabduction test [28,29]: Rayan reported a false positive rate of 13.5% for the Adson test and 47% for the costoclavicular test in a study in 200 extremities of 100 volunteers [29]. Pleva reported a false positive rate of 62% for the hyperabduction test and 11% for the Adson test in a study of 53 medical students with no symptoms [30].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 49%
“…The surgical approach can be selected according to the locoregional extension of the tumor in these different zones of the thoracic inlet (Table 2). These approaches have been previously described in published studies [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16] ; therefore, the surgical details were not included in the present report.…”
Section: Surgical Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The subclavicular approach is performed by an incision along the upper edge of the second rib below the clavicle, providing exposure to the first rib after dividing the pectoralis major muscle along its fibers and retracting the pectoralis minor muscle laterally. 8 Sectioning of the costochondral junction of the first rib and division of the costoclavicular ligament opens the costoclavicular space and provides access to the anterior part of the first rib up to the subclavian vein and anterior scalene muscle. The subclavicular incision can be combined with a vertical cervicotomy along the anterior border of the sternocleidomastoid muscle in an L-shape fashion to either split the manubrium and elevate the sternoclavicular articulation with the clavicle (transmanubrial approach) or divide the sternal attachment of the sternocleidomastoid muscle and remove the proximal part of the clavicle (transcervical-thoracic approach) to have adequate exposure of the subclavian vein and artery.…”
Section: Surgical Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Secondly, there is much controversy regarding the optimal surgical procedure for relieving the symptoms. Whilst current debate is largely focused on whether a transaxillary or supraclavicular approach gives best results, other procedures are well described [5][6][7][8][9][10]. Nonetheless, there is much variation in the reported post-operative outcome, whichever procedure is used.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%