2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.patcog.2013.09.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Subclass Discriminant Analysis of morphological and textural features for HEp-2 staining pattern classification

Abstract: Classifying HEp-2 fluorescence patterns in Indirect Immunofluorescence (IIF) HEp-2 cell imaging is important for the differential diagnosis of autoimmune diseases. The current technique, based on human visual inspection, is time-consuming, subjective and dependent on the operator's experience. Automating this process may be a solution to these limitations, making IIF faster and more reliable. This work proposes a classification approach based on Subclass Discriminant Analysis (SDA), a dimensionality reduction … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
27
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast to previous studies that utilized Fisher's LDA for dimensionality reduction and Knearest neighbors (KNN) classifier for classification [24], [25], we employed a Bayesian linear classifier to classify all the subclasses C ij (i = 1, 2, ..., 8; j = 1, 2, 3) and then mapped the subclasses into original classes C ij → C i (i = 1, 2, ..., 8; j = 1, 2, 3).…”
Section: 2) Subclass Classificationmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In contrast to previous studies that utilized Fisher's LDA for dimensionality reduction and Knearest neighbors (KNN) classifier for classification [24], [25], we employed a Bayesian linear classifier to classify all the subclasses C ij (i = 1, 2, ..., 8; j = 1, 2, 3) and then mapped the subclasses into original classes C ij → C i (i = 1, 2, ..., 8; j = 1, 2, 3).…”
Section: 2) Subclass Classificationmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…2.1) Subclass Divisions: How to divide each class into different subclasses is a crucial problem in SDA. Different unsupervised algorithms have been attempted in this field, including K-means clustering [25], [28], dynamic cluster formation [26], Gaussian mixture model [29], hierarchical clustering [24], nearest neighbor (NN) clustering [22], and valley seeking algorithm [27]. However, these unsupervised methods usually clustered data in terms of their inherent similarity, overlooking the physical meanings of the clustered data.…”
Section: Data Processing and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A general criterion for granule construction is to draw elements with indistinguishability, similarity, proximity or functionality together [28]. Traditional granulation methods adopt unsupervised clustering algorithms, such as Nearest Neighbour (NN) [26], K-Means [29], [30], hierarchical clustering [31], spatial partition trees [32], fuzzy C-means [20], [22], [33], [34], and prototype-based optimization [35], to construct granules. The unsupervised algorithm ensures the elements with certain similarity to be assembled into one granule, however the granules are non-interpretable in the view of semantic context.…”
Section: Attribute-driven Granular Model For Pattern Recognition mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the same dataset (ICPR 2012 dataset) and experimental protocols, researchers can evaluate their work in a more convincing way. For example, Di Cataldo et al [31] propose a classification approach based on subclass discriminant analysis (SDA) using the integration of morphological, global, and local texture features. It obtains an accuracy of 72.2%.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%