2011
DOI: 10.1002/cne.22681
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Subcellular localization of patched and smoothened, the receptors for sonic hedgehog signaling, in the hippocampal neuron

Abstract: Cumulative evidence suggests that, aside from patterning the embryonic neural tube, Sonic hedgehog (Shh) signaling plays important roles in the mature nervous system. In this study, we investigate the expression and localization of the Shh signaling receptors, Patched (Ptch) and Smoothened (Smo), in the hippocampal neurons of young and mature rats. Reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction and immunoblotting analyses show that the expression of Ptch and Smo remains at a moderate level in young postnatal … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
63
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
(91 reference statements)
4
63
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our conclusion about the importance of Shh activity for regulating synapse development is fully consistent with that of Harwell et al, and the similar results obtained with different types of neurons using very different experimental approaches makes the conclusion even more meaningful and physiologically relevant. It is worth noting that the findings by Harwell et al also support our previous observations of the dendritic source of Shh (Petralia et al, 2011b) in hippocampal neurons and the negligible Ptch and Smo on the axons (Petralia et al, 2011a;Petralia et al, 2012).…”
Section: Shh Signaling Changes the Physiology Of Hippocampal Neuronssupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our conclusion about the importance of Shh activity for regulating synapse development is fully consistent with that of Harwell et al, and the similar results obtained with different types of neurons using very different experimental approaches makes the conclusion even more meaningful and physiologically relevant. It is worth noting that the findings by Harwell et al also support our previous observations of the dendritic source of Shh (Petralia et al, 2011b) in hippocampal neurons and the negligible Ptch and Smo on the axons (Petralia et al, 2011a;Petralia et al, 2012).…”
Section: Shh Signaling Changes the Physiology Of Hippocampal Neuronssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…In the central nervous system, the best-characterized function for Shh is its ability to stimulate the proliferation of cerebellar granule cells (Dahmane and Ruiz i Altaba, 1999;Wallace, 1999;Wechsler-Reya and Scott, 1999) and neural progenitor cells residing in specific areas of the brain (Lai et al, 2003;Palma et al, 2005;Breunig et al, 2008;Han et al, 2008). In addition to acting as a mitogen for cells with stem-cell properties, Shh signaling components remain expressed in differentiated (postmitotic) neurons, including hippocampal neurons (Traiffort et al, 1999;Sasaki et al, 2010;Petralia et al, 2011a;Petralia et al, 2011b). In this study, we investigated whether Shh signaling activity has a function in hippocampal neurons.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, in the mossy terminals of the rat hippocampus, numerous spinules form from the convoluted postsynaptic dendrite protrusions (“thorny excrescences”; Chicurel and Harris 1992; Petralia et al 2011; Fig. 7).…”
Section: Synaptic/neuronal Invaginating Projections In More Complex Amentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Purkinje cell spines that form synapses with climbing fibers also sometimes may invaginate almost completely into the climbing fiber terminal (Palay and Chan-Palay 1974). In the giant mossy fiber terminals of the hippocampus (see “Small Postsynaptic Invaginating Projections: Spinules” section), the postsynaptic thorny excrescences, although not technically spines, can be nearly completely invaginated into the mossy terminals (Nitsch and Rinne 1981; Chicurel and Harris 1992; Petralia and Wenthold 1992; Petralia et al 2011). Inner hair cells of the mouse cochlea (see subsequent sections below) can be involved in a three-way circuit among a hair cell body, and afferent and efferent terminals, and all three processes may include some invaginating postsynaptic spine processes (Sobkowicz et al 2003).…”
Section: Synaptic/neuronal Invaginating Projections In More Complex Amentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation