1987
DOI: 10.1104/pp.85.1.78
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Subcellular Localization of Amines and Activities of Their Biosynthetic Enzymes in p-Fluorophenylalanine Resistant and Wild-Type Tobacco Cell Cultures

Abstract: Three levels of free amines and the activities of their biosynthetic enzymes were measured in subcellular fractions of two cell lines of Nicotiana tabacum L. cv Xanthi. The TX4 cell line, a p-fluorophenylalanine resistant culture which accumulates high levels of cinnamoylamides, was compared to the wild-type culture TX1. In cells harvested on day 6 of the growth cycle, nearly all free putrescine, spermidine, and tyramine was found in the supernatant fraction of both cell lines. Although a consistent portion of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

1988
1988
1998
1998

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, the changes in polyamine content, which are almost the same in shoots and roots, cannot be correlated to the pattern of PAo activity. This fact and the cell wall localization of PAO once again favour the hypothesis of a compartmentation of the polyamine metabolic machinery, as already demonstrated in plants for their biosynthetic enzymes (Torrigiani et al 1986, Walker et al 1987.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…On the other hand, the changes in polyamine content, which are almost the same in shoots and roots, cannot be correlated to the pattern of PAo activity. This fact and the cell wall localization of PAO once again favour the hypothesis of a compartmentation of the polyamine metabolic machinery, as already demonstrated in plants for their biosynthetic enzymes (Torrigiani et al 1986, Walker et al 1987.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…Previous work attempting the subcellular localization of ADC involved the measurement of enzyme activity (Torrigiani et al, 1986; Walker et al, 1987). However, these studies have been questioned because of artifacts resulting from the use of 14 C trapping (Birecka and Birecki, 1993;Smith, 1993).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%