1992
DOI: 10.1007/bf00319155
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Subcellular fractionation of rainbow trout gonads with emphasis on microsomal enzymes involved in steroid metabolism

Abstract: Rainbow trout gonads were subfractionated by differential centrifugation with emphasis on obtaining preparations suitable for the study of steroid-metabolizing enzymes. A fractionation scheme was evaluated for the mature testis and for 3 ovarian developmental stages. The distribution of cell organelles among the fractions was determined using enzyme-markers and electron microscopy. The fractionation scheme was found to be suitable for separating mitochondria and microsomes which were recovered at similar yield… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, the proportion of debris (i.e., membranes, granules, and nuclei) recovered in the other fractions was not assessed in our work even though this fraction is a significant one with respect to mass and represents more than half of the metal accumulated in many studies (Wallace and Luoma ; Rainbow et al ; Leonard et al ). Moreover, Andersson () has already observed that DNA could accumulate in the cytosol following subcellular fractionation and our own PCR analysis (Supporting Information Fig. S1) suggested the presence of DNA in every fractions following the fractionation of D. magna .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…Furthermore, the proportion of debris (i.e., membranes, granules, and nuclei) recovered in the other fractions was not assessed in our work even though this fraction is a significant one with respect to mass and represents more than half of the metal accumulated in many studies (Wallace and Luoma ; Rainbow et al ; Leonard et al ). Moreover, Andersson () has already observed that DNA could accumulate in the cytosol following subcellular fractionation and our own PCR analysis (Supporting Information Fig. S1) suggested the presence of DNA in every fractions following the fractionation of D. magna .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…Subcellular fractionation was performed by modifying a previously described method [41]. Cells were washed twice with ice‐cold NaCl/P i and homogenized in lysis buffer containing 20 m m HEPES/NaOH, pH 7.5, 250 m m sucrose, 1 m m EDTA, and 1× protease inhibitor cocktail (F. Hoffmann‐La Roche, Basel, Switzerland) by 50 strokes in a Dounce‐type homogenizer.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The microsomal fractions of liver, head kidney, trunk kidney and gonads were obtained by differential centrifugation according to published methods (F6rlin, 1980;Pesonen & Andersson, 1987;Andersson, 1992) except that the post-mitochondrial supernatant was frozen in liquid nitrogen before preparation of the microsomal fraction. The microsomal fractions of liver, head kidney, trunk kidney and gonads were obtained by differential centrifugation according to published methods (F6rlin, 1980;Pesonen & Andersson, 1987;Andersson, 1992) except that the post-mitochondrial supernatant was frozen in liquid nitrogen before preparation of the microsomal fraction.…”
Section: Sampling and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%