Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
1983
DOI: 10.1515/cclm.1983.21.8.473
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Subcellular Distribution, Properties and Interrelationship of Oestrogen Receptors in Endometrium and Other Target Tissues

Abstract: More than half of the extranuclear receptor content of resting cells is associated with cytoplasmic structures. Subfractionation of mierosomes reveals a preponderance of "basic" (low electrophoretic mobility) receptor in rough endoplasmic reticulum. Surfynol-dithiothreitol extracts of smooth membranes are rieh in "acidic" (high electrophoretic mobility) receptor. Trypsin increases the yields up to seven-fold, and this increase is correlated (r = 0.993) with the acidic receptor content and S'^nucleotidase activ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1988
1988
1996
1996

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 20 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This may be related to additional, poorly understood functional roles of the different domains. Hormone status-dependent specific binding of steroid receptors to elements of the cytoskeleton (Campbell et al 1989;Akner et al 1990;Barsony and McKoy t992;Sierralta et al 1995), to stress proteins (Carson-Jurica et al 1990), to ribonucleoprotein particles (Sherman and Stevens 1984) or to cell membranes (Little et al 1972;Jungblut et al 1983;Szego and Pietras 1981;Pappas et al 1995), for example, may be responsible for the variations in epitope accessibility detected. The unmasking of uterine estradiol receptors with the microwave treatment alone apparently did not suffice for the complete retrieval of all their determinants.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may be related to additional, poorly understood functional roles of the different domains. Hormone status-dependent specific binding of steroid receptors to elements of the cytoskeleton (Campbell et al 1989;Akner et al 1990;Barsony and McKoy t992;Sierralta et al 1995), to stress proteins (Carson-Jurica et al 1990), to ribonucleoprotein particles (Sherman and Stevens 1984) or to cell membranes (Little et al 1972;Jungblut et al 1983;Szego and Pietras 1981;Pappas et al 1995), for example, may be responsible for the variations in epitope accessibility detected. The unmasking of uterine estradiol receptors with the microwave treatment alone apparently did not suffice for the complete retrieval of all their determinants.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%