2013 International Conference on Intelligent Systems and Signal Processing (ISSP) 2013
DOI: 10.1109/issp.2013.6526918
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Subcarrier and power allocation with proportional fairness algorithm for LTE system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, in order to improve the resource efficiency, we usually need to change/adjust the equal fairness criteria for resource allocation among different competing uses in practical application. A typical method is to adopt the proportional fairness 12–16 for resource allocation. Under the proportional fairness, a weight mechanism is employed to assign the allocation weight (priority) for different competing users.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, in order to improve the resource efficiency, we usually need to change/adjust the equal fairness criteria for resource allocation among different competing uses in practical application. A typical method is to adopt the proportional fairness 12–16 for resource allocation. Under the proportional fairness, a weight mechanism is employed to assign the allocation weight (priority) for different competing users.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An efficient, low-complexity suboptimal joint resource allocation algorithm was proposed to improve the transmission efficiency in [2]. Considering the fairness, literature [3] proposed a proportional fairness algorithm based on utility function to allocate subcarrier and power. However, the AAS is not considered in the aforementioned works, which cannot be directly applied to AAS aided LTE networks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%