2005
DOI: 10.1111/j.1478-0542.2005.00162.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Subaltern Studies and African Studies

Abstract: In a context of increasing interest by scholars to break down area studies boundaries, this article addresses the influence and methodological potential of Subaltern Studies within the field of African studies. Originating in South Asia, Subaltern Studies has created a much‐debated dialogue between the disciplines of history, postcolonial theory, and cultural studies over the past twenty years. This brief article traces the history of this movement, its parallels at present with scholarship on Africa, and the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(5 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…28 Often the themes covered privileged subaltern groups, while some of the intellectuals who wrote these histories participated in the African freedom struggles. 29 …”
Section: Area Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…28 Often the themes covered privileged subaltern groups, while some of the intellectuals who wrote these histories participated in the African freedom struggles. 29 …”
Section: Area Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Area Studies is a particularly fruitful object of study when attempting to tease out the epistemic boundaries and contours of knowledge production. On the one hand, Area Studies can be seen as part of an emancipatory project, aligned with Subaltern Studies, that seeks to give voice to areas outside of the Global North and ‘developed’ west (Lee, 2005). On the other hand, Area Studies has been critiqued for its own geopolitical logics and orientalising modalities (Klinke, 2015) that construct and reify geographical entities to fit the orientalising gaze of scholars located in privileged spaces (Wolf, 1994, pp.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%