2022
DOI: 10.1530/edm-21-0135
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Subacute thyroiditis presenting as a painful suspicious thyroid nodule

Abstract: Summary We report a case of subacute thyroiditis in a 40-year-old female who initially presented with painful thyroid nodules without clinical and biochemical evidence of hyperthyroidism. Thyroid ultrasound was done to evaluate the thyroid nodules and fine-needle aspiration (FNA) was performed in view of the suspicious features. As the FNA showed a follicular lesion of undetermined significance or atypia of undetermined significance (FLUS/AUS, Bethesda III), she was advised for surgical excision. She was subse… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 9 publications
(16 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, the clinicians are obliged to be aware of this matter that SAT might present as suspicious nodular lesions on ultrasound and may require thyroid FNA, which is rarely used in diagnostic workups. However, one study suggested that margin, vascularity, and echogenicity may help differentiate the characteristics of SAT and malignancy and thus, the requirement for FNA gets reduced ( 75 ). Fifteen of the patients we reviewed underwent an FNA to confirm the diagnosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the clinicians are obliged to be aware of this matter that SAT might present as suspicious nodular lesions on ultrasound and may require thyroid FNA, which is rarely used in diagnostic workups. However, one study suggested that margin, vascularity, and echogenicity may help differentiate the characteristics of SAT and malignancy and thus, the requirement for FNA gets reduced ( 75 ). Fifteen of the patients we reviewed underwent an FNA to confirm the diagnosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%