2001
DOI: 10.1086/324090
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Subacute Malaria Due toPlasmodium falciparumand the Role of Polymerase Chain Reaction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 7 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although RDTs are rapid, easy to use and sensitive for P. falciparum, they lack sensitivity at low parasite density, fail to identify a large number of non-falciparum malaria, do not allow parasite quantification, are prone to some errors in reading and interpreting test lines and result in false negative malaria diagnosis when P. falciparum with Histidine Rich Protein 2 (HRP2)-deletion is involved [6,9,10,13]. At present, PCR represents the most sensitive and specific tool for the diagnosis of malaria, but its cost and turnaround time greatly limit its use outside of reference laboratories [11,[14][15][16]. Thus, blood microscopy and RDT remain the conventional methods used for malaria diagnosis in clinical practice.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although RDTs are rapid, easy to use and sensitive for P. falciparum, they lack sensitivity at low parasite density, fail to identify a large number of non-falciparum malaria, do not allow parasite quantification, are prone to some errors in reading and interpreting test lines and result in false negative malaria diagnosis when P. falciparum with Histidine Rich Protein 2 (HRP2)-deletion is involved [6,9,10,13]. At present, PCR represents the most sensitive and specific tool for the diagnosis of malaria, but its cost and turnaround time greatly limit its use outside of reference laboratories [11,[14][15][16]. Thus, blood microscopy and RDT remain the conventional methods used for malaria diagnosis in clinical practice.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%