2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00204-019-02634-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Subacute dermal toxicity of perfluoroalkyl carboxylic acids: comparison with different carbon-chain lengths in human skin equivalents and systemic effects of perfluoroheptanoic acid in Sprague Dawley rats

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
21
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
1
21
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, the concentration, repeat, and period of the exposure were to a great extent similar to those that may occur for the human skin. The measurements revealed that the production of MDA and the release of IL-1α have significantly increased in tissues treated with 2.5 mM PFASs compared with the control group whereas the level of 8-OHdG in the EpiDermFT skin model did not show any meaningful increase (Han et al, 2020). In a study on the immortal human skin keratinocyte (HaCaT) cells, however, exposure to 50 μM resulted in a remarkable growth of 8-OHdG-positive staining after a recovery period of 8 days (Peropadre et al, 2018).…”
Section: Dermal Exposure To Pfass and Immunotoxic Effectsmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In fact, the concentration, repeat, and period of the exposure were to a great extent similar to those that may occur for the human skin. The measurements revealed that the production of MDA and the release of IL-1α have significantly increased in tissues treated with 2.5 mM PFASs compared with the control group whereas the level of 8-OHdG in the EpiDermFT skin model did not show any meaningful increase (Han et al, 2020). In a study on the immortal human skin keratinocyte (HaCaT) cells, however, exposure to 50 μM resulted in a remarkable growth of 8-OHdG-positive staining after a recovery period of 8 days (Peropadre et al, 2018).…”
Section: Dermal Exposure To Pfass and Immunotoxic Effectsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The potential of a chemical for inducing skin irritation and sensitization has a direct correlation with its capability of dermal penetration. Some evidence shows that some PFASs potentially are skin irritant and sensitizer (Kennedy, 1985;Gordon, 2011;Han et al, 2020). Moreover, synthesis and release of cytokines such as interleukin-1α (IL-1α) and interleukin-8 (IL-8), two appropriate parameters for screening chemicals for their sensitizing/irritating potential (Coquette et al, 2003), have been reported under exposure to PFASs, strongly suggesting dermal absorption and penetration of these chemicals (Han et al, 2020;Lunardi et al, 2016).…”
Section: Dermal Penetration and Absorption Of Pfassmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Among the PFASs, short-chain polyfluoroalkyl carboxylic acid (SC PFCA) and perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) are mostly detectable in polluted streams. Han et al (2020) has demonstrated the noxious effects of SC PCFA on the liver, testes and kidney through in vivo model. The study also reveals that PFOA also causes microscopic abnormalities and decreases the thickness of the skin.…”
Section: Non-stickmentioning
confidence: 99%