2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2009.10.071
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sub-zero treatments of AISI D2 steel: Part II. Wear behavior

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
48
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 108 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
3
48
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Traditionally, the improvement of the tribological resistance of steel alloys was attributed to the transformation of retained austenite 1,[5][6][7] and to the refinement of secondary carbides. [8][9][10] Recent studies have shown that the martensitic transformation of retained austenite at low temperatures involves a plastic deformation of virgin martensite.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditionally, the improvement of the tribological resistance of steel alloys was attributed to the transformation of retained austenite 1,[5][6][7] and to the refinement of secondary carbides. [8][9][10] Recent studies have shown that the martensitic transformation of retained austenite at low temperatures involves a plastic deformation of virgin martensite.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rate of cooling in this method generally varies from 0.5℃/ min to 1.5℃/ min. [17] 3.2 Soaking Period Molinari et al 8 after studying different researchers of different period of soaking recommended that the maximum soaking period shouldnot be more than 35 h; as prolonged period do nothave any significant effect. Also cooling rate must not exceed 20-30°C/hr.…”
Section: Parameters Effecting the Results Of Cryogenic Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The increase in wear resistance at load of 49 N was 24.26% when compared to untreated specimen and was 18.75% when compared to shallow cryogenic treated. Das et al 17 investigated the correlation of wear behavior and hardness of AISID2 steel. The shallow cryogenic treatment in comparison to conventional heat treatment enhances the bulk hardness by just 3.8% but reduces the wear rate by 35.8% at normal load of 78.5 N. Similarly, the difference of bulk hardness between shallow cryogenically treated and deep cryogenically treated samples is marginal which was around 4.2%.…”
Section: Wear and Wear Resistancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is necessary to note that in [7] the used pin on disc ball was made from bearing steel 100Cr6 and the utilized method of evaluation was different from the one used in this paper. In addition, based on previously obtained results of the authors and study of the available literature it is possible to assume that using of a higher loading forces during the pin on disc test would be more suitable [13].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%