2021
DOI: 10.1080/10106049.2021.2017008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sub-watershed prioritization for soil erosion potentiality estimation in tenughat catchment, India

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 75 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, the dissection index (DI) value ranges from 0.23 to 0.92 indicating sw8 as being the least erosive and sw7 and sw3 as being the most erosive nature [ 14 ]. The ruggedness number (Rn) ranges from 0.05 to 1.60 indicating sw8, sw4, sw9, sw13, sw17, sw14, sw18, and sw16 has low Rn value and hence are less vulnerable to soil erosion while other Sub-watersheds have higher values with sw7 being more vulnerable to erosion [ 31 ]. Landuse landcover …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, the dissection index (DI) value ranges from 0.23 to 0.92 indicating sw8 as being the least erosive and sw7 and sw3 as being the most erosive nature [ 14 ]. The ruggedness number (Rn) ranges from 0.05 to 1.60 indicating sw8, sw4, sw9, sw13, sw17, sw14, sw18, and sw16 has low Rn value and hence are less vulnerable to soil erosion while other Sub-watersheds have higher values with sw7 being more vulnerable to erosion [ 31 ]. Landuse landcover …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%