2010
DOI: 10.1109/tuffc.2010.1708
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sub-sample displacement estimation from digitized ultrasound RF signals using multi-dimensional polynomial fitting of the cross-correlation function

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
32
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
1
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This effect can be appreciated in Figure 8, where vertically stripped patterns are visible in the magnitude and angle estimates for the PSF_1Dpar en conv_1Dpar methods. These patterns originate from the inaccurate lateral displacement estimates in regions of subsample axial displacements, as also reported earlier [33]. The benefit of using 1D parabolic interpolation is the low computational cost, whereas 2D cubic interpolation increases computational time.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…This effect can be appreciated in Figure 8, where vertically stripped patterns are visible in the magnitude and angle estimates for the PSF_1Dpar en conv_1Dpar methods. These patterns originate from the inaccurate lateral displacement estimates in regions of subsample axial displacements, as also reported earlier [33]. The benefit of using 1D parabolic interpolation is the low computational cost, whereas 2D cubic interpolation increases computational time.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…Many other studies have investigated the use of other shapes and functions, such as cosine, parabolic or spline [25,33,35,51,52], most often in 1D. However, none of these interpolators have been studied before in the context of the proposed methodology, i.e., in combination with the freedom of choosing the beamforming grid and thereby influencing the CCF shape.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations