2014
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-11558-0_9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sub-propositional Fragments of the Interval Temporal Logic of Allen’s Relations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We will describe the recently introduced sub-propositional fragments of HS [3,14,7,2]. First, we present the clausal form of HS-formulas.…”
Section: Language Modificationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We will describe the recently introduced sub-propositional fragments of HS [3,14,7,2]. First, we present the clausal form of HS-formulas.…”
Section: Language Modificationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The aim of this paper is to investigate the expressive power of the temporal logic of Halpern and Shoham (HS in short) [1] and its sub-propositional fragments in which the use of propositional connectives is restricted [2,3,4]. These fragments are especially interesting due to a relatively low computational com-and computational complexity of these fragments have been intensively studied [2,5,6], their expressive power is yet to be studied in any significant depth. Our research aims at filling this gap.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This method often results in fragments which have a good compromise between computational complexity and expressive power. Such fragments have been studied, e.g., in the case of linear temporal logic [1], temporal description logics [2], interval temporal logics [5,4], and, recently, normal modal logics K, T, K4, S4, and S5 [15,6]. Recall that K is the basic modal logic which semantically corresponds to the class of relational structures with an arbitrary binary relation, whereas in T, K4, S4, and S5 the relation is reflexive, transitive, a preorder (i.e., reflexive and transitive), and an equivalence, respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The quest of computationally well-behaved restrictions of logics, and the observation that meaningful statements can be still expressed under sub-propositional restrictions has recently increased the interest in sub-propositional fragments of temporal description logics [AKRZ14], temporal logics [AKRZ13], and interval temporal logics [AKRZ15,BMS14]. However, sub-propositional modal logics have received little or no attention, with the exception of [CL94,FP87,Ngu04], which are limited to the Horn fragment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%