2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2010.08.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sub-pixel precision image matching for measuring surface displacements on mass movements using normalized cross-correlation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
136
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 308 publications
(159 citation statements)
references
References 107 publications
2
136
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Two primary methods exist to increase the accuracy of the alignment to subpixel values. The first is curve-fitting the correlation surface to find the function's maximum [23,24]. This method can require iteratively curve-fitting a function (usually parabolic or Gaussian) to the correlation in the spatial domain and can be made arbitrarily accurate, but is computationally intensive.…”
Section: Methods For Determining Diffraction Disk Positionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two primary methods exist to increase the accuracy of the alignment to subpixel values. The first is curve-fitting the correlation surface to find the function's maximum [23,24]. This method can require iteratively curve-fitting a function (usually parabolic or Gaussian) to the correlation in the spatial domain and can be made arbitrarily accurate, but is computationally intensive.…”
Section: Methods For Determining Diffraction Disk Positionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this study, we calculated LST from Landsat ETM+ and TM thermal band spectral data (method after Barsi et al, 2005;explained in Hall et al, 2008) using a dirty ice emissivity of 0.96 after (Qunzhu et al, 1985). Glacier surface velocity, or horizontal surface displacements were derived using normalized cross-correlation repeat Landsat TM near-infrared band and repeat ETM+ pan data (methods detailed in Kääb and Vollmer, 2000;Debella-Gilo and Kääb, 2011). With the assumption that the calculated velocity field…”
Section: Complementary Supraglacial Debrismapping Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The analysis of optical imagery for landslide mapping can be performed through (i) visual interpretation of single and stereoscopic images ; (ii) image classification with semi-automated pixel-based methods (Borghuis et al, 2007;Marcelino et al, 2009); (iii) image classification with semi-automated object-oriented methods (Martha et al, 2010;Lu et al, 2011;Stumpf and Kerle, 2011); (iv) change detection techniques (Nichol and Wong, 2005;Weirich and Blesius, 2007;Tsai et al, 2010); and (v) correlation of optical images (Delacourt et al, 2007;Leprince et al, 2007;Debella-Gilo and Kääb, 2011).…”
Section: Tofani Et Al: Use Of Remote Sensing For Landslide Studiementioning
confidence: 99%