2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2014.02.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sub-pixel mapping of remote sensing images based on radial basis function interpolation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
58
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
58
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Over the past decades, many SRM methods have been proposed. These methods involve the pixel swapping algorithm [7,13], Hopfield neural networks [14][15][16], subpixel/pixel spatial attraction models [17][18][19], Markov random fields [20][21][22][23], the geometric methods [24,25], geostatistical methods [26][27][28], artificial intelligence-based algorithms [29][30][31][32][33] and interpolation-based methods [34][35][36]. These methods have obtained acceptable performances in various applications, such as urban tree identification [37], urban building extraction [38], floodplain inundation mapping [39,40] and land use mapping [41].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the past decades, many SRM methods have been proposed. These methods involve the pixel swapping algorithm [7,13], Hopfield neural networks [14][15][16], subpixel/pixel spatial attraction models [17][18][19], Markov random fields [20][21][22][23], the geometric methods [24,25], geostatistical methods [26][27][28], artificial intelligence-based algorithms [29][30][31][32][33] and interpolation-based methods [34][35][36]. These methods have obtained acceptable performances in various applications, such as urban tree identification [37], urban building extraction [38], floodplain inundation mapping [39,40] and land use mapping [41].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additional types of neural networks (e.g., a radial basis functions or RBFs) and other advanced machine learning algorithms (e.g., Random Forest and Support Vector Machines) showed strong generalization performance for various remote sensing classification problems (Mountrakis et al, 2011;H. Wang et al, 2014, Q. Wang et al, 2014. For a future study, their spatial generalization effectiveness needs to be examined and compared with the NN classifier used in this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The APP is an index with which to evaluate the areal spatial pattern, because most existing SPM methods are suited to areal features [16,18,24,25,40]. The APP is equal to the area of features with areal pattern, divided by the total area:…”
Section: Areal Pattern Proportionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The accuracy might decrease with increasing zoom factor [6,24,40,41], and therefore we are interested in establishing at which zoom factor the accuracy stabilizes.…”
Section: Spm Performance With Different Zoom Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%