2009 Second International Conference on Information and Computing Science 2009
DOI: 10.1109/icic.2009.205
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sub-pixel Edge Detection Based on Curve Fitting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…methods reconstructing image intensity function [13] which determine subpixel edge position based on properties of function modeling image intensity at the edge; these methods however are in minority, due to lack of characteristic points of image intensity function at the edge; 2. methods reconstructing image first derivative function [14], [15] which retrieve image gradient function at the edge based on gradient sample values provided by operators like Sobel, Prewitt [14] or Canny [15] -most commonly second order polynomial is fitted into gradient sample values in a small (3 -5 pixels) neighborhood; several approaches using wavelet transform instead of image first derivative have also been proposed [19], [20]; 3. methods reconstructing image second derivative function [16]- [18] which reconstruct continuous image 2nd derivative function at the edge based on sample values provided by operator LoG; most commonly image derivative function is linearly interpolated in the neighborhood where the 2nd image derivative function changes its sign [16], [17] then coordinates of the zerocrossings of the reconstructed derivative function determine edge position with subpixel accuracy.…”
Section: Reconstructive Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…methods reconstructing image intensity function [13] which determine subpixel edge position based on properties of function modeling image intensity at the edge; these methods however are in minority, due to lack of characteristic points of image intensity function at the edge; 2. methods reconstructing image first derivative function [14], [15] which retrieve image gradient function at the edge based on gradient sample values provided by operators like Sobel, Prewitt [14] or Canny [15] -most commonly second order polynomial is fitted into gradient sample values in a small (3 -5 pixels) neighborhood; several approaches using wavelet transform instead of image first derivative have also been proposed [19], [20]; 3. methods reconstructing image second derivative function [16]- [18] which reconstruct continuous image 2nd derivative function at the edge based on sample values provided by operator LoG; most commonly image derivative function is linearly interpolated in the neighborhood where the 2nd image derivative function changes its sign [16], [17] then coordinates of the zerocrossings of the reconstructed derivative function determine edge position with subpixel accuracy.…”
Section: Reconstructive Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As an example, the approach by Xu (2009a) can be given. The method approximates image intensity at the edge using second order polynomial.…”
Section: Reconstructive Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The centre extraction methods are aimed at obtaining the centre positions of light stripes. They include the methods of extreme value [13,14], threshold [15][16][17], directional template [18][19][20], grey centroid [21,22], curve fitting [23,24] and Hessian matrix [25][26][27]. Below we discuss in brief these methods and point to their advantages and shortcomings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The curve-fitting method [23,24] outlines the grey-scale distribution of the transverse section of the light stripe, employing a Gaussian curve or a parabola. The central point of the transverse section is a local maximum of the fitted curve.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%