2020
DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.01892
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sub-Lethal Effects of Pesticides on the DNA of Soil Organisms as Early Ecotoxicological Biomarkers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 122 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Currently, thorough assessment of genetic diversity of microbial communities is gained by high-throughput techniques such as NGS; however, PCR-DGGE (Muyzer et al, 1993) is a routine and commonly used technique in plant-soil ecosystem studies. Admitting that the technique has some limitations (Orlewska et al, 2018;Vischetti et al, 2020), recently a number of protocols are optimized for use with plant and soil DNA. They are confirmed to be reliable, do not require complex bioinformatics for the analyses of results, and present an overall picture on the main differences in microbial community composition when coupled with culture-dependent microbiological approaches (Sarhan et al, 2016;Vischetti et al, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Currently, thorough assessment of genetic diversity of microbial communities is gained by high-throughput techniques such as NGS; however, PCR-DGGE (Muyzer et al, 1993) is a routine and commonly used technique in plant-soil ecosystem studies. Admitting that the technique has some limitations (Orlewska et al, 2018;Vischetti et al, 2020), recently a number of protocols are optimized for use with plant and soil DNA. They are confirmed to be reliable, do not require complex bioinformatics for the analyses of results, and present an overall picture on the main differences in microbial community composition when coupled with culture-dependent microbiological approaches (Sarhan et al, 2016;Vischetti et al, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Admitting that the technique has some limitations (Orlewska et al, 2018;Vischetti et al, 2020), recently a number of protocols are optimized for use with plant and soil DNA. They are confirmed to be reliable, do not require complex bioinformatics for the analyses of results, and present an overall picture on the main differences in microbial community composition when coupled with culture-dependent microbiological approaches (Sarhan et al, 2016;Vischetti et al, 2020). And, common to the NGS methods, different primer sets can be used in PCR-DGGE, to addressing microbial communities at the phylogenetic level (e.g., 16S primers for bacteria and archaea), or at the functional level, depending on functional selected genes (Valášková and Baldrian, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The activity of β-Glucosidase, phosphatase, and urease was found to be suitable for monitoring the alteration status of soils subject to different management [ 42 , 43 ]. Alteration Index 3 (AI3) [ 47 ] successfully integrated the activity of these enzymes to provide us with a comparative assessment tool for the evaluation of the impact of management practices on soil alteration status in our study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is especially relevant when considering that the majority of Kenyan farmers who cultivate AIVs, particularly those who are in remote rural areas, have only little to moderate adaptive capacity to climate change [ 39 ]. Soil microbial community structure and soil enzymes such as β-Glucosidase, phosphatase, and urease can act as early indicators of soil health and alteration because of their sensitivity to tillage, fertilization, cultivations, drought, pesticides, and pollution [ 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DNA metabarcoding further allows assessing soil microbial biodiversity (also in terms of phylogenetic relatedness), and to compare soil communities subjected to experimental conditions or geographical distance. It is also a cost-effective method for biomonitoring as DNA metabarcoding is more frequently used for monitoring agricultural practices, restoration efforts or forensics [ 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 ]. Presently, it represents the most used molecular approach to characterize microbiota in environmental samples.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%