2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.apr.2020.02.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sub-kilometer dispersion simulation of a CO tracer for an inter-Andean urban valley

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
19
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
8
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The simulation results without data assimilation (LE) underestimated the observed concentrations in all the validation stations. This was also seen in previous related works [18,35]. The RMSE value reflected a low correspondence between the observed and simulated concentrations when using the model without data assimilation.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Data Assimilation Runssupporting
confidence: 84%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The simulation results without data assimilation (LE) underestimated the observed concentrations in all the validation stations. This was also seen in previous related works [18,35]. The RMSE value reflected a low correspondence between the observed and simulated concentrations when using the model without data assimilation.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Data Assimilation Runssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Our results displayed low correlation values and a marked tendency to underestimate the observed concentrations by the LOTOS-EUROS model without assimilation. Similar behaviors were observed in previous works [18,35]. In [35] the WRF-Chem model in a sub-kilometer configuration was used to reproduce the CO dynamics in the valley.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The simulation results without data assimilation (LE) underestimated the observed concentrations in all the validation stations. This was also seen in previous related works [24,33]. The RMSE value reflected a low correspondence between the observed and simulated concentrations when using the model without data assimilation.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…( Figure 11 (a), (c), (e), and (g)), with a slight overestimation of the concentration between 11:00 and 17:00. During the high concentration period (Figure 11 (b), (d), (f), and (h)), pollutants remain trapped in the valley due to the high atmospheric stability, which generates higher concentrations in the afternoon Henao, Mejía, Rendón and Salazar (2020), the reason why LE-AMVA reproduces better this temporal variability (although not in terms of magnitude).…”
Section: Simulated Concentrationsmentioning
confidence: 99%