2014
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.89.023422
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sub-Doppler resonances in the backscattered light from random porous media infused with Rb vapor

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

5
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this configuration the incoming beam saturates the atomic medium and the back-scattered field acts as a probe field. The sub-Doppler resonances width are essentially determined by the probe wave-vector dispersion which is mainly determined by detection solid angle [2]. This experiment shows that, as would be expected, for the pores close to the incidence surface the light field has not a diffuse nature but partially preserves the direction of propagation as well as its polarization and phase [4].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 67%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this configuration the incoming beam saturates the atomic medium and the back-scattered field acts as a probe field. The sub-Doppler resonances width are essentially determined by the probe wave-vector dispersion which is mainly determined by detection solid angle [2]. This experiment shows that, as would be expected, for the pores close to the incidence surface the light field has not a diffuse nature but partially preserves the direction of propagation as well as its polarization and phase [4].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…Porous glass is a highly scattering medium for light which can appear as detrimental for many applications. However, randomness and disorder could be sometimes a welcome property for some applications as random lasers or alignment insensitive spectroscopical references [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For higher atomic densities, such compensation is less effective as photon trapping increases the probability for an excited atom to collide with the pore surface and decay nonradiatively. The same porous medium shows sub-Doppler resonances in the backscattered light due to saturated absorption of the Rb vapor in the interstices of the medium near its surface [21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, as both fields follow inside the medium different paths and are scattered idependently, they have a relative phase that varies randomly inside the pores. Base on this random fluctuation of the relative phase, coherent effects could be neglected (atomic coherence and two-photon coherent contribution) and the exited state population was considered proportional to the step-wise two photon contribution [6].…”
Section: Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%