Su1566 Development of a DOPS Assessment Tool for Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy (PEG) Insertion

Bonnington, Stuart; Wells, C

doi:10.1016/j.gie.2015.03.1463

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The impact of the post-July 2016 changes to DOPS has also been published. Implementation of novel DOPS for GI bleeding121 and percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) have been described 135. The endoscopic non-technical skills (ENTSs) domain introduced into new DOPS/DOPyS has also been validated 126.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Impact of the Joint Advisory Group on Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (JAG) on endoscopy services in the UK and beyond

Siau

Green

Hawkes

et al. 2018

Frontline Gastroenterol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Joint Advisory Group on Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (JAG) was initially established in 1994 to standardise endoscopy training across specialties. Over the last two decades, the position of JAG has evolved to meet its current role of quality assuring all aspects of endoscopy in the UK to provide the highest quality, patient-centred care. Drivers such as changes to healthcare agenda, national audits, advances in research and technology and the advent of population-based cancer screening have underpinned this shift in priority. Over this period, JAG has spearheaded various quality assurance initiatives with support from national stakeholders. These have led to the achievement of notable milestones in endoscopy quality assurance, particularly in the three major areas of: (1) endoscopy training, (2) accreditation of endoscopy services (including the Global Rating Scale), and (3) accreditation of screening endoscopists. These developments have changed the landscape of UK practice, serving as a model to promote excellence in endoscopy. This review provides a summary of JAG initiatives and assesses the impact of JAG on training and endoscopy services within the UK and beyond.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%