2009
DOI: 10.1118/1.3181268
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SU‐FF‐I‐147: Monte Carlo Based Evaluation of 3D PET Quantification Inaccuracy for the Lung

Abstract: Purpose: Our goal is to investigate the effect on PET accuracy of the various physical and instrumental phenomena using realistic Monte Carlo (MC) models of patient activity distributions and PET scanners. Methods and materials: Data from a lung PET/CT scan is used to create numerical voxelized phantom for realistic MC simulations using the GATE MC code. We compared the activity reconstructed from the simulations to the input (“true”) values. We investigated the effects of random coincidences, photon scatter a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because of this, in some regions of the thorax the apparent number of scattered photons in the images may approach the number of true coincidences (Kang et al, 2009) (Jan et al, 2004;Schmidtlein et al, 2006), which allows exact separation of these events.…”
Section: Scatter Correctionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Because of this, in some regions of the thorax the apparent number of scattered photons in the images may approach the number of true coincidences (Kang et al, 2009) (Jan et al, 2004;Schmidtlein et al, 2006), which allows exact separation of these events.…”
Section: Scatter Correctionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7. for Monte Carlo simulated PET images of a female thorax, for which the correct position of the AC map is known (Kang et al, 2009). In practice, most vendors use heavily smoothed CT images for AC in the reconstruction process, which smooth these effects but do not eliminate them especially for larger misalignments.…”
Section: Attenuation Correctionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation